I drink. I drive. But, for the past several years I have not done both
together. My rule is zero tolerance. I will not have a sip, a glass or a bottle
if I am to drive. I will have nothing, not a drop. This is something I observe
with no exceptions. Today with so many options available, walking, auto
rickshaw, taxi, Uber and family and of course the train, I have minimal inconvenience
when I go out and drink and then have to get home. I will come to my reasons
for this rigid policy later.
I was deeply saddened, unusual for me, when I read about the grisly
deaths in the Sabuwala family in the morning newspaper. For those of you who
may be unaware, here is what happened. Ms Janhavi Gadkar, a lawyer, educated
for some time in the UK, working in a senior position in Reliance Industries,
celebrated the conclusion of a transaction by downing a few whiskeys at the
Marine Plaza Hotel at Marine Drive. She was thoroughly drunk. She got into her
car, a large Audi SUV, and drove home at high speed on the wrong side of a dual
carriageway road. After a distance of some 10 kms the inevitable happened. Mr
Sabuwala a petty soap trader was in a taxi with his family returning from a
family celebration. The cars crashed head on. Mr. Sabuwala dead, taxi driver
dead, members of Mr Sabuwala’s family injured, some seriously, some critically.
Ms Janhavi Gadkar unharmed.
Janhavi Gadkar's Audi
Every cliché in the book can be applied in this case.
Poor innocent family.
Celebration turns to sorrow.
Lives snuffed out.
Lives changed forever.
For absolutely no fault of theirs.
The poor suffer.
The rich and the powerful get away.
So many countless others. Every one will unfortunately apply and be
true. I really feel so sad.
You must have heard that other word, bandied about so much -`closure’. You must have heard how everyone
wants closure. Please tell me, how the Sabuwala kids will ever have closure as
far as their father is concerned. What had he done to have his life ended in
this way. How will they ever have closure.
I thought back to the 5 other cases that I am sure you will remember. A
drunk Sanjeev Nanda in Delhi who in his BMW killed 3 police constables and poor
migrant workers. The next would be one Mr Neel Chatterjee a senior officer at
Standard Chartered Bank who after a night of revelry killed a watchman near the
Siddhi Vinayak Temple. For some reason that case was, as they say, totally
hushed up. Case three would be a drunk Alistair Pereira who driving a Toyota
Corolla ran over migrant workers sleeping on the footpath at Carter Road in
Bandra. The fourth would be a drunk and drugged Nooriya Haveliwalla driving a
Honda CR-V another SUV, who killed a cop and a petty hotelier. The last is the
loveable Salman Bhai who was only being human when he got drunk, drove a Toyota
Land Cruiser and killed, once again, poor migrant labour sleeping on the
pavement outside American Express Laundry at Bandra. I remember the tweet by
the very erudite Abhijeet - 'Kutta road pe soyega kutte ki maut
marega' (If you sleep on the road like a dog, you will die a dog's death).
Aptly put Abhijeet ji. In every one
of this cases completely random, unconnected and innocent bystanders - as the cliché
goes – lost their lives. In every one of these cases the drunk driver escaped
unscathed. A 75 kg human body [or Kutta
as Abhijeet says] is no match against a big car weighing more than a 1200 kilos
travelling at speed.
What about the case of Charu Khandal? This is the other side of the
coin. She worked with Red Chillies the Shah Rukh Khan company as an animator. Charu and two friends were returning from a party. They may
have had a lot to drink, however, they, were not guilty of drinking and
driving, they were in an auto rickshaw. They were all above the legal age of
drinking. They were in full compliance of the law. They could not have been
more correct in their behaviour. Manoj Gautam whose car hit Charu's auto
rickshaw drove rashly, was drunk and hit the rickshaw seriously injuring Charu.
What I cannot understand is why do or why did these people do this? All
of the drivers were rich, at least rich enough to use a driver or some sort of
public transport. Why must they drive? Why must they drive at such terrifying
speeds, speeds at which you would not drive if sane? All these drivers were
socially extremely privileged and aware of not only the dangers of driving when
drunk, but presumably well-travelled to be aware of the crime. None of the 5
drivers I write about were uneducated or had not passed thru the University of
Life. Do we have no fear of the law, the rights of other human beings, the fact
that when drunk or drugged our physical and mental capabilities are impaired
and that operating heavy machines can be lethal?
The sheer idiocy or arrogance or both of Ms Janhavi Gadkar simply shocks
me. Like me, she is a lawyer. She worked at some of the better firms and is now
working with Reliance Industries. This is a position of responsibility. Did she
not realise what could happen if she drank as much as she did and drive car? Why
could she have not left her car at the Marine Plaza and catch a cab home? I
have no idea? I cannot understand this sort of behaviour.
Turning now to my own rigidity. Take a hypothetical example. I have a
small bottle of beer and drive home. I would surely not be legally drunk. On
the way home my car is overtaken by a motorcyclist with no helmet, his un-helmeted
wife riding pillion and their 4 year old son sitting on the headlamp [all
illegal]. This is a very real scene, it happens every day several times a day
when you are driving. The motorcycle hits a pothole falls over and I run the
family over in my car after having one beer. A crowd gathers, alcohol on my
breath. I am manhandled, the police arrive and I am taken into custody.
Whatever may be the rights and wrongs, all of which will be determined when the
`law takes its course’ I have alcohol on my breath. At once I am in the wrong
and no amount of explanation can change that. See what I am saying? This sort
of thing can happen to you any day any time even if you have not had a drink.
Simply add alcohol breath to the equation and you are in very deep trouble.
Now take this a step further. The newspapers pick up the story. The
headlines will scream `Top Lawyer arrested in drunk driving case’. Forget the
fact that I am a self-proclaimed washed up lawyer. Then further snooping will
reveal this blog from where the papers will publish that I enjoy drinking, I
drink at the hallowed Bombay Gymkhana. And so on and so forth. No I am not
blowing my own trumpet. This is something that is all too real. I do not want
any of this. I do not need to drink and drive.
It is possible Abhijeet tweeted wrongly. The real `Kuttas’ are the drivers. They should die a `Kuttas’ death. Unfortunately, it is the innocents who are dying a dog’s
death. Such utterly pointless and avoidable deaths.
I really am saddened.
Good that you don’t do drunk driving. It is crucial to consider a DUI charge seriously. DUI defense is a specialized area of criminal defense and is quite complex. Having an experienced DUI defense lawyer on your side could make a huge difference in the case outcome. My brother works with a DUI attorney Los Angeles and have told me that all these things determine outcome of case to a great extent.
ReplyDelete